April 23, 2025

Cultural Evolution: Caught in the Devil's Bargain - Volume II, Influencing Sociocultural Evolution

 

A book cover with text and a black and white image

AI-generated content may be incorrect.


Volume II, Influencing Sociocultural Evolution, answers the question: What does the study of culture and cultural evolution offer in practical terms for positively influencing the future of humankind and Earth? Vol. II is also available on Amazon in hardback and paperback. Click here. An e-book version is available here. An Amazon Kindle version is not available.

Excerpt

Cultural Evolution: Caught in the Devil’s Bargain

Volume II: Influencing Sociocultural Evolution

James E. Lassiter

Introduction to Volume II

––––––––––––––––––––

Philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways. The point is

to change it. – Karl Marx, 1845

Greek philosopher Heraclitus of Ephesus (c. 500BCE) was one of the earliest thinkers in the Western tradition to put in writing his thinking about the processes of change. For Heraclitus change is eternal. All things have one thing in common, they change. Everything is continually becoming something else. It is Heraclitus who has been credited with having said: “It is not possible to step into the same river twice.”

In addition to change being a constant, Heraclitus argued that change is manifest as a tension between elements that brings them into opposition. In this tension neither competitor wins permanently. For him, the world we see around us is a continuous struggle: animal against animal; man against woman; religion against religion; ideas against ideas; social classes and nation-states against each other. This process, he believed, forces everything on Earth and throughout the universe to act or strive to become better, and ultimately a general improvement comes about in every sphere. Without struggle and striving, he thought individuals, societies, and humankind could not become complete.

Beyond this, continued Heraclitus, all elements, great, small, simple, and complex, are linked. There is a natural order everywhere in the universe. Historian Will Durant sees Heraclitus’ ideas having a deep legacy in the thinking of the West. He says they influenced Greco-Roman Stoic philosophy as well as Darwin’s theory of biological evolution.

Beyond his views about change, what he called universal flux, and the unity of opposites where opposites coincide, Heraclitus believed that fire was the first cause of everything and that there was a reason for every occurrence. Regarding fire, Heraclitus’ views extended far beyond the chemical reaction. He conflated fire with the human soul and God. All things, he thought, are just manifestations of fire. Fire is eternal in that it consumes fuel continually and it is inseparable from God. Heraclitus considered fire the ultimate reality. 

Did Heraclitus have it right, is change the only universal process? Over the two and a-half millennia since Heraclitus wrote, what have we, through philosophy, science, and the discoveries of anthropology, learned about change, especially social and cultural transformation?

A range of economic, technological, political, and social changes over the past 6,000-8,000 years, especially since the advent of permanently settled large-scale agriculture, have influenced humankind’s evolution. These processes, with varying degrees of impact, have resulted in changes in the direction, tone, and meaning of being human. The drivers of these processes include technological and economic innovations, infrastructural and social urbanization, social stratification and bureaucratization, continued and often increased inter-group conflict, and an ever-increasing formal, autocratic exercise of political and legal power over human beliefs, values, and norms. Changes in the tone and meaning of being human have included psychological and affective changes, and what we think of others and how we treat each other.

Cultural evolution is the transformation of particular societies and regional cultural traditions or civilizations over extended periods of time. These changes in the way we live have been influenced by dominant societies and taken directions in response to the adaptivity of culture. A critical amount of the direction and tone of cultural evolution, within societies and globally, has not been questioned or has been obfuscated. These muddying and misleading notions include progress, human exceptionalism, nationalism, a transfer of allegiance from religion to science and technology, and a biological deterministic and Social Darwinian understanding of human nature. The influence of these ways of thinking has led to a multiplex human and planetary existential crises.

Archive for "Being Human"